---I was in a grumpy mood the other night and I'm sorry that I came across pretty harsh.
Anyways, my main thing is just because something was done poorly in the past or has (even a lot of) bad examples doesn't mean it can't be done right. I just am getting a little tired of new ideas somewhat consistently getting shat upon here. I admit all ideas are not great and maybe even most ideas aren't good. But they should be given a fair chance.
-----
so as with any background; if it's animated it just kind of goes without saying, imo, how they should be done but again, this is rather subjective. I know how I would design something like this but at this point it seems rather pointless to go into detail. Becaaaaaaaaaause it seems that people just keep doing it their way anyway regardless of many multiple suggestions/rants to tell people to do it a different way
Which I'm not saying is right or wrong...
----
I *think* I might prefer Nepster's suggestion of using objects). Using objects would at least give you more freedom for being artistic.
someone's background could have twinkling stars
I feel that namida's approach to this in his LemPlus Space style is more suitable for stars: Make them (moving) background objects with random start frame. This offers a lot more freedom than a fixed twinkling star background.
By "this" I meant moving background images. I thought the bees were that, apparently they are not. Maybe they are just an object.
The bees are moving background objects, and can be hidden by the appropriate setting.
wait what??? I'm so confused now. I have not yet used this feature yet. If I get time soon I will look into this because obviously I'm missing something. IfIf this already exists, then why is there even an issue of moving backgrounds not being possible?