I assume: When you click a radio button on the left, you don't affect the final result (summarized at bottom-right), but you make the program show a different set of controls at the top-right. Choices in the top-right affect the final result even after you click different radio buttons on the left, which hides the earlier top-right choices.
In this case, the Replay Kind radio buttons are action buttons with immediate effect, not choices, which violates
Nielsen's guideline #12 on Checkboxes vs. radio buttons: "Use checkboxes and radio buttons only to change settings, not as action buttons that make something happen."
The column of radio buttons isn't the appropriate UI widget for Replay Kind. Instead, the dialog should have tabs, one tab per Replay Kind. The different Replay Kinds should be a row of tab handles, probably across the left because you'd need multiple rows if you put them across the top.
Nielsen: Tabs Used Right, guidelines #10 and #11, are at odds with each other for us here.
I think you should keep the summary below the tabs, it's succinct and good. Although -- if we need the summary at all, keep in mind guideline #3 of Tabs Used Right and weigh the tabbing against a huge dialog that shows all Actions for all Replay Kinds at once. Most likely, tabs and summary are fine.
Having radio buttons for Replay Kind would be fine if, after confirm and exit the dialog, the Action for the single chosen Replay Kind were the
only Action to happen, and nothing happened for other Replay Kinds. Then, the radio buttons for Replay Kind would be choices that affect the final result of the dialog (you'd un-violate guideline #12), and the immediate showing/hiding of Actions would be nice progressive disclosure of the appropriate sub-options for the single chosen Replay Kind.
-- Simon