It is possible that "6 Gaps, 5 Builders" got easier due to a physics change from 0.6 to 0.7 ("Builder creates brick further ahead, like in NL. No builder backstep."). So the question is if it should be downranked or fixed?

moving the last block 1 px to the right.

If by "last block", we mean the final island in the water and not the exit platform, and we move this island 2 hi-res pixels to the right, then all 4 covering replays still pass.

We can, in addition, move the exit platform rightwards by at least 8 hi-res pixels, and all 4 covering replays will still pass. Do we want to move the exit platform, too? E.g., we can move it by 4 hi-respixels, and then re-center everything by moving everything leftwards by 2 pixels.

-- Simon

Quote from: geoo on April 23, 2021, 08:14:03 PM

moving the last block 1 px to the right.

If by "last block", we mean the final island in the water and not the exit platform, and we move this island 2 hi-res pixels to the right, then all 4 covering replays still pass.

We can, in addition, move the exit platform rightwards by at least 8 hi-res pixels, and all 4 covering replays will still pass. Do we want to move the exit platform, too? E.g., we can move it by 4 hi-respixels, and then re-center everything by moving everything leftwards by 2 pixels.

Yes, that's what I meant. My rationale for that change was to make it impossible to bridge two gaps with a single builder, while making sure execution doesn't become harder.
I don't remember what exactly the intended solution is, like bridge 3 gaps with 2 builders or bridge 4 gaps with 3 builders, and how many variations of that are possible now,
so that can be investigated too, but I think ensuring there's no place for a single builder to bride two gaps is the most important part.