I'm not home on Friday evening (nor am I during the weekend). I could probably make it earlier on Friday, or on Wednesday or Thursday evening, or alternatively we could just wait until next week.

This is a nice one! Below my proposed solution.

Attached are my versions of Rescue Ranger Trolls! (Technically, it's a WIP level name which I never changed, happy for suggestions or to keep it.)
The original had the issue that you could dig under the trailblazer landing platform, redirecting them straight to an exit. In the attached archive I also included "B" versions which fix this. They are currently untested though, so it'd be good to for someone to review them.

@Dominator: I really like your multi-hatch versions, and I think they make great additions! I also appreciate the subtle differences in gap width etc, which add a bit of variety. The quirk with the possibility of building so that the bridge saves only one player does seem exploitable, though only with a lot of effort. I guess it'd be good to have a fix, but not crucial?
I had look at my version, and it doesn't seem to be possible there. Basically the chute is 1 lo-res px wide, but there is a slight asymmetry (both in the original and in the "B" version, in a slightly different way). I think it can be fixed, basically if everything is symmetrically around the 1 px chute I think everything should work out, but I haven't tested. No-one has noticed as of now, and I hope the asymmetry in the "B" version is just as subtle that it won't make a difference in practice. If it turns out to be exploitable in some way I'd try to fix it though.

Quote from: geoo on April 23, 2021, 08:14:03 PM

moving the last block 1 px to the right.

If by "last block", we mean the final island in the water and not the exit platform, and we move this island 2 hi-res pixels to the right, then all 4 covering replays still pass.

We can, in addition, move the exit platform rightwards by at least 8 hi-res pixels, and all 4 covering replays will still pass. Do we want to move the exit platform, too? E.g., we can move it by 4 hi-respixels, and then re-center everything by moving everything leftwards by 2 pixels.

Yes, that's what I meant. My rationale for that change was to make it impossible to bridge two gaps with a single builder, while making sure execution doesn't become harder.
I don't remember what exactly the intended solution is, like bridge 3 gaps with 2 builders or bridge 4 gaps with 3 builders, and how many variations of that are possible now,
so that can be investigated too, but I think ensuring there's no place for a single builder to bride two gaps is the most important part.

There is also Golf It! which is a little bit cheaper: https://store.steampowered.com/app/571740/Golf_It/
I don't have that one, not sure my laptop can handle the graphics but I would hope so.

The github for Playforia has a releases page where you can download the binaries: https://github.com/PhilippvK/playforia-minigolf/releases
I guess someone with a stable internet connection (so probably not me) would have to run the server, and everyone else would connect to it. We can do some testing at some point if you want.

A site that doesn't require signup sounds great, I'd be down for a few games!

I also prefer Sunday.

Technically, all questions are optional.

And if you skip, you pretty much always get the worst possible score.
Makes sense you get 0 here rather than -1 for skipping, but it didn't come to my mind at all, and I was surprised so many players opted for it even though it wasn't explicitly mentioned anywhere.

I'm not a fan of the inverse scoring question type myself, although it was funny to see the results. The recursive reverse psychology is fun a few times, but it seems to me that in the end it comes down to luck. I could use a couple less.

Same here.

I do have on my mental list of projects to work on writing something that lets me automatically write Family Feud results. I used to host Family Feud on another forum, but writing the results was a lot of work, and it seems like it could be automated fairly easily.

I wrote a script for that back in the day, see here and here (I'm not sure there's a difference between the two, but I linked both just in case.)